Department of Labor and state wage agencies

California DLSE Berman Hearing Employer Response

Reference guide. Last verified 2026-07-03. Sources cited below.

The situation

Carmen, 44, owns a 12-employee nail salon in Anaheim, California. She's operated the salon for eight years, paying her nail technicians as independent contractors on a commission basis. Last Tuesday she received a DLSE "Notice of Wage Claim" from the California Labor Commissioner. A former technician, Ana, who worked for Carmen for six months before leaving to work at a competitor, has filed a claim alleging $8,400 in unpaid wages: 14 weeks × 40 hours × $15/hour (she claims $15/hour as minimum wage for all hours worked, disputing her IC status) minus what she was paid on commission.

Carmen has 30 days to submit a written response contesting the claim. If she does nothing, a default may be entered. A Berman hearing will be scheduled.

(a) California's ABC test (AB 5) governs whether nail technicians are ICs or employees in CA. For Ana to be an IC, all three prongs must be met: (A) free from control, (B) performing work outside the usual course of the business (nail salon work IS the usual course of Carmen's business, so prong B fails), and (C) an independently established business. Carmen's nail technicians almost certainly fail the ABC test, meaning they ARE employees under California law, and Carmen owes overtime, minimum wage protections, and meal/rest break compliance going back potentially four years;

(b) BUT: even if Ana is correctly classified as an employee, the DLSE claim can be disputed on the AMOUNT. Carmen has 14 weeks of sign-in/sign-out logs showing Ana's actual hours (37.5 hours/week average, not 40), commission records showing Ana's actual earnings ($2,100/week in commissions = $56/hour at 37.5 hours = well above minimum wage), and tip records showing Ana received cash tips that are counted toward minimum wage compliance under certain conditions;

(c) The documentation Carmen needs at the conciliation conference: original time sheets (or the equivalent digital logs from her scheduling app), weekly commission payout receipts, Ana's signed independent contractor agreement, her business license (none, Ana has no separate business license), and Carmen's written salon policies on breaks;

(d) The Berman hearing's conciliation conference is her best opportunity: DLC mediators routinely suggest settlement amounts in the $1,500–$3,000 range for disputed IC/overtime claims where the employer has some documentation, far below Ana's $8,400 demand;

(e) An employment attorney quoted Carmen $2,800 for "full representation through the Berman hearing." The attorney's fee is one-third of the disputed amount, the economics barely pencil for Carmen. A structured framework to organize her documents and understand what to argue would let her represent herself at the conciliation conference and, if necessary, the formal hearing.

Who receives this

California small business employers (5–25 employees) in high-complaint industries: restaurants, nail salons, hair salons, cleaning services, agricultural labor, retail, and construction subcontractors. These are employers who have received their first or second DLSE wage claim and don't know what the Berman hearing process involves. They have payroll records and time records (however informal) but don't know how to organize them into a formal defense. NOT suitable for: employers with large class-wide claims involving multiple employees ( to requires employment attorney for class action risk); employers with clear Labor Code violations who should simply pay; claims involving retaliation or harassment allegations ( to more complex, attorney-mandatory).

Why the agency will not advise you

The California DLSE's explicit mission is protecting employee wage rights, it is the adversarial enforcement body. DLSE cannot build "how to contest our wage orders" tools without contradicting its own statutory mandate. The Fisher Phillips and Jackson Lewis employment law firms are the only resources for employer defense, at $1,500–$4,000 per matter, their fees often exceed the disputed amount for small claims ($2,000–$10,000).

Key facts, with sources

  • California's Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) receives approximately 200,000 wage claims per year, making it the most active state labor enforcement agency in the US. The claim types most common in California: (1) Overtime, California requires overtime pay for hours over 8 per day (not just 40 per week) and daily double-time for hours over 12 per day; (2) Minimum wage, California's 2025 minimum wage of $16.50/hour ($20/hour for fast food under AB 1228) creates compliance complexity for small employers; (3) Final pay / waiting time penalties, California Labor Code 203 imposes 30 days of daily wages as a penalty if the employer willfully withholds final pay; (4) Meal/rest break premiums, employees are entitled to 1 additional hour of pay for each missed 30-minute meal break and each 10-minute rest break; (5) Independent contractor misclassification, California's ABC test (AB 5, effective January 2020) creates strong presumption of employment, making IC classification difficult for most gig/service workers. Each waiting time penalty claim automatically adds up to 30 days × daily wage rate to the base claim. Source: Defending Wage Claims Before the California Labor Commissioner — Fisher Phillips LLP · Wage Claim Adjudication — California Labor Commissioner's Office (DLSE)
  • The DLSE Berman hearing process has three stages for employers who contest a wage claim: (1) Written response (optional but recommended within ~30 days of the Notice of Claim): employer submits written objection to the claim and documents to DLSE; (2) Conciliation conference: informal meeting with a Deputy Labor Commissioner (DLC) who attempts to help the parties settle; DLC provides a preliminary assessment of the claim's validity, employers who bring complete time records and payroll documentation to the conference achieve favorable outcomes significantly more often than those who appear without documentation; (3) Formal Berman hearing: if the conference doesn't resolve the claim, a formal evidentiary hearing is held within 90 days of the claim; testimony is taken under oath; business records are admitted; DLC issues an ODA (Order, Decision or Award). Either party may appeal the ODA to Superior Court within 45 days, the appeal STAYS enforcement of the ODA, meaning the employer does not have to pay the award while the Superior Court case is pending. Employment law firms charge $1,500–$4,000 for DLSE representation at all stages. Source: Labor Commission Hearings and Conferences — Employer Defense — Watkins Firm · Practical Guidance: Wage Claim Procedures and DLSE Berman Hearings — Ford Harrison
  • DLSE provides extensive, multilingual (8 languages) guidance to employees on how to file wage claims, what their rights are, and how to navigate hearings. DLSE provides zero employer defense guidance, employers are directed to 'seek legal counsel.' Employment law firms serve the employer-defense market exclusively through attorney representation. No self-serve $79 employer defense tool for DLSE Berman hearings was found in two dedicated searches, consistent with the structural reality that both the enforcement body (DLSE) and employee-side resources have strong incentives to provide employee guidance, while employer-defense has been reserved for the billable-hour attorney market. Source: Division of Labor Standards Enforcement — Home Page (Mission Statement) · Berman Hearings — Simas & Associates, Ltd.

When to bring in a professional

Self-serve responses fit routine cases: clear facts, amounts a business can absorb, and a deadline still ahead of you. Bring in a licensed professional when the amount at stake is large relative to their fee, the facts are genuinely disputed, criminal exposure is possible, or the deadline has already passed. A short paid consultation to sanity-check your plan is often worth it even when you handle the filing yourself.

Want a response tool for this notice?

This notice type has a research guide but no interactive builder yet. Leave an email and we will tell you if that changes. Nothing else is ever sent to it.

Related notices

All sources for this guide

  1. Defending Wage Claims Before the California Labor Commissioner — Fisher Phillips LLP
  2. Wage Claim Adjudication — California Labor Commissioner's Office (DLSE)
  3. Labor Commission Hearings and Conferences — Employer Defense — Watkins Firm
  4. Practical Guidance: Wage Claim Procedures and DLSE Berman Hearings — Ford Harrison
  5. Division of Labor Standards Enforcement — Home Page (Mission Statement)
  6. Berman Hearings — Simas & Associates, Ltd.

This guide is general information compiled from the cited public sources, last verified on the date above. It is not legal advice, and rules change; confirm anything you rely on against the linked source or with a licensed professional in your state.