Outside the US (UK, Canada, Australia, EU)

ACCC Australian Consumer Law Investigation Response

Reference guide. Last verified 2026-07-07. Sources cited below.

The situation

Marcus, 38, runs HomeGear Direct, a Melbourne-based e-commerce business selling home appliances and furniture online (AU$2.8M annual revenue, 12 employees). In May 2026, he received a letter from the ACCC: "We are conducting an investigation into HomeGear Direct Pty Ltd's compliance with the Australian Consumer Law. We require the following documents and information to be produced by [date 30 days away]..."

The letter references "concerns about your refund and return practices" and "subscription service cancellation terms."

(a) He doesn't know which specific ACL provision he's alleged to have breached. The ACCC's opening letter is intentionally broad. His refund policy says "refunds at our discretion", which may violate consumer guarantees (ss.51-65 ACL). His furniture protection plan subscription has no easy cancellation mechanism, which may now violate the new unfair trading practices provisions (Schedule 9, August 2024). He doesn't know whether ACCC is targeting both or just one.

(b) He doesn't know whether to respond proactively or wait. His solicitor says "cooperate and offer a s.87B voluntary undertaking", but that means admitting issues. Another adviser says "send minimal records and wait." The correct answer depends on which provisions are at issue and how strong ACCC's evidence already is.

(c) The cost of professional advice is disproportionate. DW Fox Tucker quoted AU$8,000 for "investigation response strategy." Corrs quoted AU$15,000 for "full investigation representation." HomeGear Direct's net annual profit is AU$280,000. Marcus needs to understand his position and respond appropriately, not spend 3-5% of annual profit on law firm fees for a first-response letter.

Who receives this

Australian SMBs (5–200 employees, AU$1M–$50M revenue) operating e-commerce, subscription services, franchising, or consumer products/services who receive ACCC investigation letters, s.155 notices, or advisory letters.

Why the agency will not advise you

The ACCC cannot advise businesses on how to respond to its own investigations. The ACCC's Small Business resources are explicitly for complainants, not respondents. The only professional alternative is competition/ACL law firms at AU$5,000–$20,000, priced for the litigation risk, not the document-response need. For Australian SMBs receiving their first ACCC advisory letter or investigation opening letter, a structured, jurisdictionally-accurate self-serve response kit captures the gap between "ignore it and hope" and "spend AU$15,000 on solicitors."

Key facts, with sources

New ACL unfair trading practices provisions commenced August 2024 under Schedule 9 to the Treasury Laws Amendment (More Competition, Better Prices) Act 2022. These provisions prohibit subscription traps, drip pricing, and pressure selling tactics, creating a new wave of ACCC enforcement activity specifically targeting SMB e-commerce and subscription businesses. The ACCC's 2025–26 compliance and enforcement priorities explicitly identify unfair contract terms (with a focus on cancellation terms and automatic renewal clauses) and consumer guarantees (with a focus on consumer electronics) as key SMB-relevant enforcement areas. Source: ACCC compliance and enforcement priorities 2025–2026 — ACCC · Consumer law in focus: 2024 recap and emerging priorities in 2025-2026 — Lexology · ACCC Conducts Sweep of Online Statements for Compliance with Australian Consumer Law — Jones Day
The ACCC has broad investigation powers under section 155 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), allowing it to compel businesses to provide information and documents within a specified time period. ACCC formal investigations in 2025-26 opened across 14+ sectors in the ACCC's website compliance sweep, with advisory letters sent to 100+ businesses. ACCC formal investigation response is handled exclusively by competition/ACL law firms (Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Ashurst, Baker McKenzie, Clayton Utz, DW Fox Tucker) at AU$5,000–$20,000. No self-serve ACCC investigation response tool has been identified. Source: ACCC Investigations in Australia 2026: a Practical Playbook for Businesses — DW Fox Tucker · Competition and Consumer Insights 2026 — Gilbert + Tobin · ACCC's compliance and enforcement priorities 2025-26 address — ACCC
The ACCC's Small Business resources are structured to help small businesses AS COMPLAINANTS about large firm conduct, not as respondents to ACCC investigations. This structural asymmetry mirrors the US FTC and CFPB pattern: the regulator provides consumer/complainant guidance but cannot advise respondent businesses on how to defend against its own enforcement actions. Australian small businesses (defined as those with fewer than 100 employees or annual turnover under AU$10M) have access to the ACCC's Small Business Concierge for general guidance, but the Concierge does not provide investigation response strategy. Source: Small business — ACCC · Consumer Protection Laws and Regulations Report 2026 Australia — ICLG

When to bring in a professional

Self-serve responses fit routine cases: clear facts, amounts a business can absorb, and a deadline still ahead of you. Bring in a licensed professional when the amount at stake is large relative to their fee, the facts are genuinely disputed, criminal exposure is possible, or the deadline has already passed. A short paid consultation to sanity-check your plan is often worth it even when you handle the filing yourself.

Want a response tool for this notice?

This notice type has a research guide but no interactive builder yet. Leave an email and we will tell you if that changes. Nothing else is ever sent to it.

Related notices

All sources for this guide

This guide is general information compiled from the cited public sources, last verified on the date above. It is not legal advice, and rules change; confirm anything you rely on against the linked source or with a licensed professional in your state.