Trademarks, patents, and copyright

AI Synthetic Media & Likeness State Law Opt-Out Demand Letter

Reference guide. Last verified 2026-07-05. Sources cited below.

The situation

Performers, voice actors, independent musicians, models, and ordinary individuals increasingly discover that AI companies or bad actors have cloned their voice, replicated their face in AI-generated images, or used their likeness in synthetic ad content without consent. Since 2023, multiple states have enacted statutes, the Tennessee ELVIS Act, Illinois IAIAA, Texas AIUA, and California AB 1836, creating private rights of action with statutory damages. The federal TAKE IT DOWN Act (2025) added federal protection for nonconsensual intimate synthetic content. Despite these rights, most affected individuals have no way to send a legally grounded demand letter that cites the controlling statute, identifies the AI company's registered agent in the relevant state, and satisfies the statutory prerequisites for damages, short of hiring an entertainment or IP attorney.

Who receives this

Independent musicians and voice actors who discover AI apps are generating music or speech in their style; social media creators and models whose faces appear in AI-generated images; individuals whose likeness or voice is used in AI-generated ad content without compensation or consent; entertainment lawyers and talent managers handling multiple clients.

Why the agency will not advise you

The AI company's legal defense team that would evaluate the demand cannot advise the claimant on how to strengthen the demand against that same company. General C&D generators produce legally generic letters without statutory element analysis. ControlAI's Deepfakes Letter is an advocacy tool for legislative change, not a demand to the company that used your likeness. The state-law specificity (ELVIS Act vs. AIUA vs. IAIAA vs. AB 1836) matters: each statute has different covered persons, covered acts, available remedies, and damages multipliers.

Key facts, with sources

When to bring in a professional

Self-serve responses fit routine cases: clear facts, amounts a business can absorb, and a deadline still ahead of you. Bring in a licensed professional when the amount at stake is large relative to their fee, the facts are genuinely disputed, criminal exposure is possible, or the deadline has already passed. A short paid consultation to sanity-check your plan is often worth it even when you handle the filing yourself.

Want a response tool for this notice?

This notice type has a research guide but no interactive builder yet. Leave an email and we will tell you if that changes. Nothing else is ever sent to it.

Related notices

All sources for this guide

  1. Deepfake Legislation Tracker: Federal, State Laws — Stack Cyber
  2. Summary of Artificial Intelligence 2025 Legislation — NCSL
  3. Senate Committee Advances Bill to Protect Name, Image, Likeness and Voice Against Unauthorized AI Use — Holland & Knight
  4. Synthetic Media & Voice Cloning: Right of Publicity Risks for 2026 — Holon Law
  5. Deepfakes Letter Template — ControlAI
  6. Rethinking the Right of Publicity in Deepfake Age — Michigan Technology Law Review

This guide is general information compiled from the cited public sources, last verified on the date above. It is not legal advice, and rules change; confirm anything you rely on against the linked source or with a licensed professional in your state.